When it comes to flac vs wav i have to say that both flac and wav have their own strong and weak points.
Wav vs vinyl vs flac.
But with a flac you will get the same thing no matter what.
See our youtube debate.
In short vinyl is fun but flac is more consistent.
Vinyl can still push music to the limits of its dynamic range 55 70db but it often shies away from doing so in order to maintain sound quality.
Alac vs flac vs wma lossless.
There s very little compression so the loudest parts of those sounds often.
A lossless file the flac free lossless audio codec is compressed to nearly half the size of an uncompressed wav or aiff of equivalent sample rate but there should be no loss in terms of how it sounds.
Flac files are compressed so they take less space than wav and are better suited for storing music.
It is same to wav ape aiff etc.
However wav files also take a lot of space.
A wav file is significantly larger than an equivalent file in flac format since the former one isn t compressed.
But sometimes the vinyl version will have better dynamic range.
Flac files can also provide a resolution of up to 32 bit.
Check out our listening results.
Vinyl is a bit inconsistent.
Wav files are uncompressed which is great for audio editing.
I do admit vinyl is fun and nostalgic with the crackles imperfect grooves and the feeling you get when you put the needle on the record.
The results may surprise you as they did us.
That s why snare drums cymbal splashes and other loud instruments have so much more punch in vinyl recordings.
To make it clear sometimes a wav file is longer than flac because wav cannot recognize the period of salience while flac can.
Vinyl may be captured and stored in any aforementioned lossless file type without capturing losses.
This means you can store more music on a hard drive.
Everyone loves a flac.
The main difference between these two formats is compression.